|
|
Post by cocoaed on Oct 1, 2012 14:26:55 GMT -5
is almost as exciting as talkin about was.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Oct 1, 2012 19:57:41 GMT -5
Considering that board went belly up it doesn't bode well for this place.
|
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Oct 2, 2012 10:08:34 GMT -5
is almost as exciting as talkin about was. Then post some topics for discussion instead of sitting back and complaining about this forum. |
|
|
|
Post by cocoaed on Oct 2, 2012 15:49:30 GMT -5
Eye eye Captian Jones!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Oct 3, 2012 4:39:25 GMT -5
Seriously speaking, it really doesn't appear any people posting in the General Forum truly want any conversation or discussion, unless there's some controversy or drama. The biggest thread was all about shutting down another forum.
Politics isn't any better.
The only person willing to post any real discussion was Jamie and it looks like he's not interested. Can't blame him.
|
|
|
|
Post by yugomary on Oct 3, 2012 5:10:32 GMT -5
Start debating please. It is important to argue with anonymous forum members on the internet.
|
|
|
|
Post by jpatterson on Oct 3, 2012 5:31:56 GMT -5
I will be happy to post discussion as soon as the administration takes care of the "children." Until then, no point.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Oct 3, 2012 6:36:44 GMT -5
I will be happy to post discussion as soon as the administration takes care of the "children." Until then, no point. From what I've read you already know DaveyJones so I don't see where you'll get any satisfaction from that. I don't know him but I don't see anyone doing anything about the disruptors. Until that changes (unliley) only other course of action is to ignore them. Post anyway - I'll discuss with you. |
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Oct 3, 2012 13:48:24 GMT -5
I will be happy to post discussion as soon as the administration takes care of the "children." Until then, no point. From what I've read you already know DaveyJones so I don't see where you'll get any satisfaction from that. I don't know him but I don't see anyone doing anything about the disruptors. Until that changes (unliley) only other course of action is to ignore them. Disruptors  If they bother you so much then why are you and peterson always talking about it...Get a topic going and like you said "ignore them". If they get a way out of hand then the administrator and moderator will deal with them. |
|
|
|
Post by cocoaed on Oct 3, 2012 14:34:02 GMT -5
This place is GREAT!!!
|
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Oct 3, 2012 15:36:56 GMT -5
I will be happy to post discussion as soon as the administration takes care of the "children." Until then, no point. From what I've read you already know DaveyJones so I don't see where you'll get any satisfaction from that. I don't know him but I don't see anyone doing anything about the disruptors. Until that changes (unliley) only other course of action is to ignore them. Disruptors If they bother you so much then why are you and peterson always talking about it...Get a topic going and like you said "ignore them". If they get a way out of hand then the administrator and moderator will deal with them. Are you for real?? Did you not understand a single thing posted? Topics have been started. That shouldn't have a single thing to do what jpatterson (not peterson) is talking about. Much of their stuff is ignored, but because they annoy and disrupt conversations for no reason other than to deliberately annoy and disrupt she (or anyone else) doesn't feel a need to be quiet about it. If you've bothered to truly look at it as an admin and moderator would then you'd see what jpatterson is talking about. It appears she's right - it's a waste of time to say anything to you about it because you're not going to do anything. Interesting that those who repeatedly post childish crap are completely ignored by you, yet you want to take issue with our posts? Nice. Of course, your friends will be along shortly to "share their views". |
|
|
|
Post by hailmary on Oct 3, 2012 20:46:32 GMT -5
change to decaf tomjor.
|
|
|
|
Post by jpatterson on Oct 4, 2012 4:40:13 GMT -5
I will be happy to post discussion as soon as the administration takes care of the "children." Until then, no point. From what I've read you already know DaveyJones so I don't see where you'll get any satisfaction from that. I don't know him but I don't see anyone doing anything about the disruptors. Until that changes (unliley) only other course of action is to ignore them. Disruptors If they bother you so much then why are you and peterson always talking about it...Get a topic going and like you said "ignore them". If they get a way out of hand then the administrator and moderator will deal with them. Davey is like one of those parents who think his "kids" do no wrong and everyone else should have to just get over it. I have ignored the children on the board. The point is, I shouldn't have to. This is an adult forum, and if you, the administrator, moderator, and whatever other title you have given yourself, actually did something about it,then you might a a forum more would want to participate in. As is, your forum is flailing. Btw.......Is butchering peoples names your new "fun" tactic? |
|
|
|
Post by myche on Oct 4, 2012 5:40:28 GMT -5
Still angry JP???
|
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Oct 4, 2012 9:29:10 GMT -5
From what I've read you already know DaveyJones so I don't see where you'll get any satisfaction from that. I don't know him but I don't see anyone doing anything about the disruptor's. Until that changes (unliley) only other course of action is to ignore them. Disruptor's If they bother you so much then why are you and peterson always talking about it...Get a topic going and like you said "ignore them". If they get a way out of hand then the administrator and moderator will deal with them. Are you for real?? Did you not understand a single thing posted? Topics have been started. That shouldn't have a single thing to do what jpatterson (not peterson) is talking about. Much of their stuff is ignored, but because they annoy and disrupt conversations for no reason other than to deliberately annoy and disrupt she (or anyone else) doesn't feel a need to be quiet about it. If you've bothered to truly look at it as an admin and moderator would then you'd see what jpatterson is talking about. It appears she's right - it's a waste of time to say anything to you about it because you're not going to do anything. Interesting that those who repeatedly post childish crap are completely ignored by you, yet you want to take issue with our posts? Nice. Of course, your friends will be along shortly to "share their views". If the administrator or moderator deleted everybody you're asking for then there will be no point keeping this forum,YES there are disruptors but they are staying within the rules set up for this forum...AGAIN,once they violate those rules THEN they are GONE.Why is it SOOOOO hard for you to simply ignore them ?? Maybe you want talking about system of "by invitation only",that's not going to happen on here simply because I don't believe in that type of censorship. |
|
If they bother you so much then why are you and peterson always talking about it...Get a topic going and like you said "ignore them".