|
|
Post by jamie on Dec 13, 2012 10:58:34 GMT -5
Unbelievable. What kind of freaks of nature subscribe to Time magazine. They just voted Kim Jung Un as Person of the Year.
|
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Dec 13, 2012 12:49:16 GMT -5
Newsweek going out of business soon and Time mag will follow....Just a matter of time before Life mag goes out too.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Dec 13, 2012 12:56:08 GMT -5
Unbelievable. What kind of freaks of nature subscribe to Time magazine. They just voted Kim Jung Un as Person of the Year. Perhaps you didn't notice this important part: The poll allows readers to weigh in on the people--and things (Hello, Curiosity Rover!)-- whom they think influenced the news, for better or worse[/u], in 2012. You may not like it but it is nonetheless important to note it due to its relevance to the context of the topic. Any of this making sense to you? |
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Dec 13, 2012 12:57:55 GMT -5
Newsweek going out of business soon and Time mag will follow....Just a matter of time before Life mag goes out too. How on earth did you come to that conclusion? Please share the information you're getting that tells you clearly that they're going out of business. |
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Dec 13, 2012 16:16:45 GMT -5
Unbelievable. What kind of freaks of nature subscribe to Time magazine. They just voted Kim Jung Un as Person of the Year. Perhaps you didn't notice this important part: The poll allows readers to weigh in on the people--and things (Hello, Curiosity Rover!)-- whom they think influenced the news, for better or worse[/u], in 2012. You may not like it but it is nonetheless important to note it due to its relevance to the context of the topic. Any of this making sense to you?[/quote] Hands down the biggest influence on the news worldwide was the election. That criteria of news influencer means Romney/Obama would have been voted as person of the year. The tin horn tyrant barely was a blip on the news. Only a freak of nature would vote for the tin horn tyrant. |
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Dec 13, 2012 17:10:50 GMT -5
Newsweek going out of business soon and Time mag will follow....Just a matter of time before Life mag goes out too. How on earth did you come to that conclusion? Please share the information you're getting that tells you clearly that they're going out of business. Maybe I should have mentioned newsweek "print edition" but you already knew that... Time and Life just a matter of time...stay tuned. |
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Dec 14, 2012 5:44:18 GMT -5
How on earth did you come to that conclusion? Please share the information you're getting that tells you clearly that they're going out of business. Maybe I should have mentioned newsweek "print edition" but you already knew that... Time and Life just a matter of time...stay tuned. If you meant the print edition then yes, you should have said that. It always helps to be clear about your message. But they're still not going out of business. They're adjusting their business model to adapt to the changing market. That's a smart and appropriate business strategy, not an indication of a company going out of business. |
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Dec 14, 2012 5:47:21 GMT -5
Perhaps you didn't notice this important part: The poll allows readers to weigh in on the people--and things (Hello, Curiosity Rover!)-- whom they think influenced the news, for better or worse[/u], in 2012. You may not like it but it is nonetheless important to note it due to its relevance to the context of the topic. Any of this making sense to you?[/quote] Hands down the biggest influence on the news worldwide was the election. That criteria of news influencer means Romney/Obama would have been voted as person of the year. The tin horn tyrant barely was a blip on the news. Only a freak of nature would vote for the tin horn tyrant.[/quote] That's your opinion. You're entitled to it. They're entitled to theirs. Interesting that since you don't agree with or like their opinion you call them a derogatory name. |
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Dec 14, 2012 10:37:28 GMT -5
Maybe I should have mentioned newsweek "print edition" but you already knew that... Time and Life just a matter of time...stay tuned. If you meant the print edition then yes, you should have said that. It always helps to be clear about your message. But they're still not going out of business. They're adjusting their business model to adapt to the changing market. That's a smart and appropriate business strategy, not an indication of a company going out of business. Read today's edition of FLT on Page 13a Al Neuharth explains it well. "Newsweek Failure" |
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Dec 14, 2012 11:31:32 GMT -5
If you meant the print edition then yes, you should have said that. It always helps to be clear about your message. But they're still not going out of business. They're adjusting their business model to adapt to the changing market. That's a smart and appropriate business strategy, not an indication of a company going out of business. Read today's edition of FLT on Page 13a Al Neuharth explains it well. "Newsweek Failure" No he doesn't. You're not providing anything that says Time or Newsweek is going out of business. And you won't find anything that says that. They are adapting to changes in the marketplace. We are now in the digital age and so this is a normal course of action. |
|
|
|
Post by jamie on Dec 14, 2012 18:48:17 GMT -5
Hands down the biggest influence on the news worldwide was the election. That criteria of news influencer means Romney/Obama would have been voted as person of the year. The tin horn tyrant barely was a blip on the news. Only a freak of nature would vote for the tin horn tyrant. That's your opinion. You're entitled to it. They're entitled to theirs. Interesting that since you don't agree with or like their opinion you call them a derogatory name. It was meant as a compliment. |
|
