|
|
Post by muffin on Sept 16, 2012 7:43:37 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Sept 16, 2012 7:58:51 GMT -5
It's not about the topless pictures. It has much more to do with the lengths the media will go to in order to get pictures or a scoop. They were on a private residence far away from any public access. The pictures taken required high performance cameras with extremely long focus lenses. If any civilian non-media photographer had taken those pictures they'd likely be labeled a pervert or voyeur. This has a lot to do with some expectation of privacy. They realize they are public figures but they should be able to expect some degree of respect for their private time. Isn't that a fair request?
|
|
|
|
Post by muffin on Sept 16, 2012 8:16:10 GMT -5
It's not about the topless pictures. It has much more to do with the lengths the media will go to in order to get pictures or a scoop. They were on a private residence far away from any public access. The pictures taken required high performance cameras with extremely long focus lenses. If any civilian non-media photographer had taken those pictures they'd likely be labeled a pervert or voyeur. This has a lot to do with some expectation of privacy. They realize they are public figures but they should be able to expect some degree of respect for their private time. Isn't that a fair request? ..... poor rich and famous, they really have it tough! |
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Sept 16, 2012 9:24:14 GMT -5
Don't be jealous. You could be rich and/or famous if you wanted it. Anyone can have anything they want if they're willing to pursue it. Those who don't typically hate on those who do.
|
|
|
|
Post by tomjor on Sept 16, 2012 10:26:12 GMT -5
Did you delete your own post or is the Phantom at it???
|
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Sept 16, 2012 11:01:19 GMT -5
.....with topless pics of Princess Kate, we all have boobs! So thats what the royal boobs look like.... |
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on Sept 16, 2012 11:04:47 GMT -5
It's not about the topless pictures. It has much more to do with the lengths the media will go to in order to get pictures or a scoop. They were on a private residence far away from any public access. The pictures taken required high performance cameras with extremely long focus lenses. If any civilian non-media photographer had taken those pictures they'd likely be labeled a pervert or voyeur. This has a lot to do with some expectation of privacy. They realize they are public figures but they should be able to expect some degree of respect for their private time. Isn't that a fair request? I think the question is.... You have any idea what a publisher would pay for those pictures? |
|
|
|
Post by muffin on Sept 16, 2012 13:11:30 GMT -5
.....with topless pics of Princess Kate, we all have boobs! So thats what the royal boobs look like.... ....."perky" little suckers! |
|
