|
|
Post by DaveyJones on May 6, 2013 16:00:00 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by rule62 on May 6, 2013 16:10:59 GMT -5
Sounds like a great program. It's not taxpayer funded. I see no problem with it.
|
|
|
|
Post by muffin on May 6, 2013 16:33:27 GMT -5
Sounds like a great program. It's not taxpayer funded. I see no problem with it. .....agreed |
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on May 6, 2013 18:54:38 GMT -5
Sounds like a great program. It's not taxpayer funded. I see no problem with it. Thats cause Obama administration hasnt heard of this yet...  |
|
|
|
Post by rule62 on May 6, 2013 19:15:22 GMT -5
The program is funded through donations. Some of us consider pets to be family members. To those of us who feel this way, the idea of surrendering a pet, because the owner's family has temporarily fallen on hard times, is deplorable. I'm glad the help is available.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamie on May 6, 2013 20:53:13 GMT -5
Sounds like a great program. It's not taxpayer funded. I see no problem with it. Don't know if I would call it a great program. It be ok. I see no problem with it either. There are plenty of useless foolish things people throw their money away on. At least this endeavor benefits something living. |
|
|
|
Post by DaveyJones on May 8, 2013 8:57:34 GMT -5
Don't know if I would call it a great program. It be ok. I see no problem with it either. There are plenty of useless foolish things people throw their money away on. At least this endeavor benefits something living.[/quote]  |
|
|
|
Post by rule62 on May 8, 2013 13:06:15 GMT -5
It depends on your perspective, I guess. For me, anything that creates a reduction in the number of pets being turned in to shelters is a great program.
|
|
|
|
Post by jamie on May 8, 2013 19:47:17 GMT -5
It depends on your perspective, I guess. For me, anything that creates a reduction in the number of pets being turned in to shelters is a great program. That would be true |
|
